|
By
Tim Wildmon | AFA President
Blame the Republicans for the recent Supreme Court ruling striking
down the Texas law banning same-sex sodomy. The GOP is responsible.
The pro-life party. The party that says they believe in traditional
family values. The party that claims to be conservative. No doubt
many if not the majority of Republicans
in the current Congress are conservative on social issues. President
Bush is for the most part. But recent Republican presidents especially
Ronald Reagan and George Bush (elder) failed miserably with
three Supreme Court appointees.
Seven of the nine current Supreme Court justices were appointed
by Republican presidents. They include William Rehnquist (Nixon),
John Paul Stephens (Ford), Sandra Day OConnor (Reagan), Antonin
Scalia (Reagan), Anthony Kennedy (Reagan), David Souter (Bush) and
Clarence Thomas (Bush). Only Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Bryer
were appointed by a Democrat Bill Clinton.
This is a court that overturned Nebraskas state law against
partial-birth abortion. This is also the court that protected the
Boys Scouts of America by only one vote last year when the state
of New Jersey tried to force the Scouts to allow homosexual men
to be Scout masters. Forget overturning the infamous Roe v. Wade
decision that legalized abortion.
Although I dont necessarily believe it, I understand the frustration
of those who say theres not a lot of difference between Democrats
and Republicans. Among OConnor, Kennedy and Souter, if just
two of them were conservatives we would see Roe v. Wade overturned.
Instead we have three social liberals.
Think about that. President Reagans legacy is two liberals
on the Supreme Court. What a shame. With Souter, then-President
Bush chickened out to the liberals in the Senate and went with someone
he knew little about to avoid a fight with Ted Kennedy, Patrick
Leahy, etc. It was a weak, pathetic decision.
Let me share with you some comments from Dr. D. James Kennedy of
Coral Ridge Ministries in a press release the day of the Texas sodomy
decision.
The Supreme Court today overruled not only itself, but a 3,000-year-old
legal and moral tradition, by striking down a Texas law banning
same-sex sodomy. It is a decision that the nation and this court
will come to regret most grievously, as the implications unfold
in coming years.
The Courts ruling is first and foremost a declaration
of secular supremacy. Our nation, founded on the laws of nature
and of natures God, is now, it seems, officially off-limits
to the moral framework that allowed us to enjoy freedom and prosperity
that is unique in world history.
The moral-legal tradition that stretches back to the Code
of Justinian, St. Patricks Book of the Law of Moses and the
laws of Englands King Alfred the Great all of which
contributed to English common law and served as the taproot of the
American legal system is here today disavowed by this Court.
This most unfortunate ruling will undoubtedly bring with it
many deleterious consequences. It will greatly undermine the primacy
of marriage and place in the hands of homosexual activists a powerful
tool to beat down resistance to their demands for the legalization
of same-sex marriage. It is clear that this Court will
offer no assistance on that question. Americans must now fend for
themselves by passage of a Federal Marriage Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. Only that will remove this question from the courts
and the demands of homosexuals.
This 6-3 ruling will also lead to other major shifts in American
society. Enormous pressure will now be brought to bear against the
Pentagon to lift existing restrictions on homosexuality in the military.
Likewise, this opens the door to adoption by same-sex couples and
will strengthen the hand of those who seek to restrict the free
speech rights of individuals and groups who object to homosexual
behavior.
Finally, this Court itself will be a victim of this ruling.
Just 17 years ago in Bowers v. Hardwick, the Court ruled that The
Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals
to engage in sodomy. Now, it has changed its mind.
In 1992 the Court in Casey v. Planned Parenthood had
the opportunity to reverse itself on another searing moral issue:
abortion. It did not. It said then that to overrule itself under
fire in the absence of the most compelling reason to reexamine a
watershed decision would subvert the Courts legitimacy beyond
any serious question. For this Court, a loss of legitimacy will
be the most pronounced result of this ruling.
Once more, the Court is leading the nation down a path that
will lead to enormous social conflict and moral decline. I hope
that Christians will pray fervently for this nation and this Court
that this appalling decision will be ameliorated in its effect and
will itself, in due course, be overturned.
May God help us.
|
|