By Thomas Sowell, Syndicated columnist
July 2009 – While the rest of us may be worried about violent Mexican drug gangs on our border or about terrorists who are going to be released from Guantanamo, the director of Homeland Security is worried about “right-wing extremists.”
Just who are these right-wing extremists?
According to an official document of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, right-wing extremists include “groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.” It also includes those “rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority.”
If you fit into any of these categories, you may not have realized that you are considered a threat to national security. But apparently the Obama administration has its eye on you.
According to the same official document, the Department of Homeland Security “has no specific information that domestic right-wing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence.” But somehow they just know that you right-wingers are itching to unleash terror somewhere, somehow.
So-called “honor killings” by Muslims in the United States, including a recent beheading of his wife by a leader of one of the American Muslim organizations, do not seem to arouse any concern by the Department of Homeland Security.
When it comes to the thuggery of ACORN (controversial left-wing group) – its members harassing the homes of bankers and even the home of Senator Phil Gramm when he opposed things that ACORN favored – the Department of Homeland Security apparently sees no evil, hears no evil, and speaks no evil.
Maybe they are too busy worrying about right-wing “extremists” who don’t like abortions or illegal immigration, or who favor the division of power between the state and federal governments established by the Constitution.
In one sense, the Department of Homeland Security paper is silly. In another sense, it can be sinister as a revealing and disturbing sign of the preoccupations and priorities of this administration, and their willingness to witch hunt and demonize those who dare to disagree with them.
Reportedly, the FBI and the Defense Department are cooperating with the Department of Homeland Security in investigations of returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. That people who have put their lives on the line for this country are made the target of what is called the Vigilant Eagle program suggests that this administration might be more of a threat than the people they are investigating.
All this activity takes on a more sinister aspect against the background of one of the statements of Barack Obama during last year’s election campaign that got remarkably little attention in the media. He suggested the creation of a federal police force, comparable in size to the military.
Why such an organization? For what purpose?
Since there are state and local police forces all across the country, an FBI to investigate federal crimes and a Department of Justice to prosecute those who commit them, as well as a Defense Department with military forces, just what role would a federal police force play?
Maybe it was just one of those bright ideas that gets floated during an election campaign. Yet there was no grassroots demand for any such federal police nor any media clamor for it, so there was not even any political reason to suggest such a thing.
What would be different about a new federal police force, as compared to existing law enforcement and military forces? It would be a creation of the Obama administration, run by people appointed from top to bottom by that administration, and without the conflicting loyalties of those steeped in existing military traditions and law enforcement traditions.
In short, a federal police force could become President Obama’s personal domestic political army, his own storm troopers.
Perhaps there will never be such a federal police force. But the targeting of individuals and groups who believe in some of the fundamental values on which this country was founded, and people who have demonstrated their patriotism by volunteering for military service, suggests that this potential for political abuse is worth watching, as Obama tries to remake America to fit his vision.
Copyright 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.
UPDATE: Napolitano says report withdrawn
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says the report that outraged conservatives and many veterans has been withdrawn.
“The report is no longer out there,” she told a U.S. House Homeland Security Committee on May 13. “An employee sent it out without authorization.”
The report was distributed to state and local law enforcement officials in March via of the Homeland Security Department’s “intel Web site.”
She told the House committee that the report is being rewritten.
David K. Rehbein, commander of the American Legion, said the withdrawal of the report “validates our objections.”
“It did not contain any evidence,” Rehbein said. “It was an unfair and unsubstantiated stereotype based on Timothy McVeigh.”
Several groups including AFA have called on President Obama to replace Napolitano. In a recent letter to supporters, AFA chairman and founder Donald Wildmon wrote: “You and I and literally millions of free-thinking, Bible-believing, God-fearing, pro-life, limited-government Americans are potential domestic terrorists! That’s why we are calling for her dismissal.”
The Washington Times, 5/14/09